![]() ![]() The topic of history and history writing in the Deuteronomistic History (and in the rest of the Hebrew Bible) is a large and important topic distinct from, but related to, the theory of the DH.Īrchaeology and Material Culture of Nabataea and the Nabat.Īltered States of Consciousness in the BibleĪrchaeology and Material Culture of Ammon and the Ammonite.Īrchaeology and Material Culture of Aram and the ArameansĪrchaeology and Material Culture of Judah and the Judeans. These challenges have given rise to a proliferation of new theories, as detailed below. While the theory still enjoys significant support in modified forms, many of its central tenets have been called into question. ![]() Noth’s theory was so persuasive that it was widely accepted within critical scholarship until recently. He noted similarities in language, style, and content among these biblical books in his Überlieferungsgeschichtliche and suggested that an originally unified work was composed during the exilic period by an individual-the “Deuteronomist” (Dtr)-reflecting on the loss of the kingdoms soon after the Babylonian conquest of Jerusalem in 587–586 BCE following the conclusion of 2 Kings. The architect of the modern theory, which holds to greater unity within the work, was Martin Noth who built upon older theories (see Noth’s Theory ). In the late 19th century, some scholars conceived of the DH as a loosely edited collection of works, written in reference to some of the standards espoused in the book of Deuteronomy. ![]() The Deuteronomistic History (DH) is a modern theoretical construct holding that behind the present forms of the books of Deuteronomy and Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings (the Former Prophets in the Hebrew canon) there was a single literary work. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |